LD
Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 revenue was $981 million (+6% YoY) and diluted EPS was $0.33; adjusted EBITDA was $148 million with 15.1% margin, reflecting improved program execution, favorable mix, and leverage on higher volume .
- Backlog reached $8.5 billion (+10% YoY) and bookings were $1.27 billion (book-to-bill 1.3x), sustaining multi-year growth visibility .
- 2025 guidance formalized: revenue $3.425B–$3.525B, adjusted EBITDA $435M–$455M, adjusted EPS $1.02–$1.08, tax rate 19%, diluted WASO 270M; Q1 2025 guide of ~$725M revenue, mid-10% adjusted EBITDA margin .
- Capital return introduced: dividend of $0.09 per share and authorization for up to $75M buybacks; Q4 free cash flow was $416M, FY FCF $190M, bolstering return capacity .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Record demand and backlog: “record bookings” and 1.3x book-to-bill for Q4 and FY, with backlog at $8.5B; management emphasized strong demand across advanced sensing, network computing, force protection, and electric power & propulsion .
- Margin expansion drivers: IMS margin uplift from improved Columbia Class profitability, and broader program transitions from development to production aiding margins and growth .
- Strategic positioning and investment: CEO highlighted DRS’s “agility and innovation” and investments in sensing modalities, directed energy, AI and quantum in sensing/processing; IRAD and CapEx stepped up ~25% YoY in 2024 and further in 2025 .
What Went Wrong
- IMS quarterly revenue dip: Q4 IMS revenue declined 1% YoY due to program timing in force protection, despite strong full-year growth and margin gains .
- Non-GAAP adjustments and FX: Q4 “other one-time non-operational events” increased (FX impacts on balance sheet items), requiring non-GAAP reconciliation and potentially complicating comparability .
- Macro/budget uncertainty: New administration’s 8% reallocation focus and possible CR risks could affect 2026 appropriations; management noted 75% of 2025 revenue already in backlog, but cautioned on evolving priorities .
Financial Results
Quarterly Trend vs Prior Quarters (oldest → newest)
Year-over-Year Comparison (Q4 2023 → Q4 2024)
Segment Breakdown (Q4 2024 vs Q4 2023)
KPIs
Estimates vs Actuals
S&P Global consensus estimates for Q4 were unavailable due to SPGI request limit; as a result, a comparison to consensus cannot be provided at this time. Values would be retrieved from S&P Global if available.*
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “DRS delivered record bookings, mid-teens organic revenue growth, healthy adjusted EBITDA margin expansion and solid free cash flow generation… We remain strategically focused on capitalizing on our momentum to drive continued growth.”
- Technology/investment: “Expansion of our sensing modalities, directed energy capabilities, enabling the application of AI and quantum in sensing and processing… our new facility in Charleston, South Carolina.”
- Fixed-price readiness: “We’re about 85% fixed price now… You need to understand what the development risk means for production cost… I think we’ve become quite good at that.”
- Electric power & propulsion strategy: “Industrial-based funding… will strengthen… design, manufacture, integration and test of steam turbine systems… creating capacity for next-generation platforms.”
- International momentum: “Percentage of revenue coming from international customers rose to 13% in 2024… clear international growth opportunities.”
Q&A Highlights
- Non-GAAP adjustments: CFO clarified Q4 “other one-time non-operational events” were primarily FX impacts on certain balance sheet items in the adjusted EBITDA reconciliation .
- Margin drivers beyond Columbia: Smaller sensing and force protection programs moving from development to production will contribute “1/4 or 1/3” of margin improvement alongside Columbia .
- OTH radar opportunity: Transitioning from components to prime contracts; potential inclusion in broader missile defense architecture under new priorities .
- DDG(X) and KDDX: Growing attention for electric propulsion on DDG(X) with design decisions in next couple of years; KDDX bid remains active but timing uncertain .
- Supply chain/materials: Safety stock in [indiscernible] material; pricing volatility observed; otherwise supply chain predictable, availability strong .
- Budget environment/CR risk: 8% reallocation focus toward missile defense; CR would more likely impact 2026; 75% of 2025 revenue in backlog provides near-term insulation .
Estimates Context
- Attempted to retrieve S&P Global consensus for Q4 revenue, EPS, and EBITDA; data was unavailable due to SPGI request limit, so we cannot provide a beat/miss assessment at this time.*
- Given strong actuals and management’s raised and formalized guidance for 2025, sell-side estimates may need to adjust upward for revenue and margins, particularly reflecting Columbia profitability and dev→prod transitions .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Backlog and bookings underpin multi-year growth; Q4 bookings of $1.27B and backlog of $8.5B support the 6%–9% organic growth outlook for 2025 .
- Margin trajectory improving, led by Columbia and program transitions; IMS Q4 margin expanded 290 bps YoY, and company expects another 30–50 bps in 2025 .
- New capital return program is a positive catalyst: $0.09 dividend and $75M buyback; diluted WASO guidance of 270M could be revised with buyback execution .
- Free cash flow strength in Q4 ($416M) and net cash positioning enhance optionality for both M&A and returns; watch Q1 seasonality (expected FCF outflow similar to Q1 2024) .
- Strategic exposure to missile defense, counter-UAS, advanced sensing, and naval electric propulsion aligns with new administration priorities; OTH radar and DDG(X) could be incremental drivers .
- Risks to monitor: potential 2026 CR impact, supply chain pricing volatility in certain materials, and program timing within force protection affecting quarterly cadence .
- Near-term trading: narrative supports positive sentiment on backlog/guide/dividend initiation; absence of consensus data tempers immediate “beat/miss” interpretation, but qualitative momentum is strong.*
Notes:
*Estimates data was unavailable due to S&P Global request limits at retrieval time; consensus comparisons cannot be provided here.